Mr Kobler had broken every promise he made before he forced Iranian refugees to move to the Camp Liberty ‘concentration camp’ where they are now at extreme risk of attack without any protection from Iraq, the Un or the US, Mr Guiliani said.
And he demanded that Liberty residents be immediately be given UN refugee status and moved swiftly back to the relative safety of camp Ashraf.
Mr Guiliani launched his criticism of Mr Kobler at conference in Houston, Texas, on Friday (Feb 22) entitled ‘Iran: Prospects for Democratic Change, U.S. Policy Options’.
The former mayor, who was in office during the 9/11 terror attacks in New York, described his impressions of Camp Liberty in the wake of the deadly February 9 bombing of the camp that left seven people dead.
He said: “This isn’t a camp, this isn’t a relocation camp, and these are trailers. These are ridiculously tiny trailers that are sitting in the middle of an area that sometimes for long periods of time is over 100 degrees, that rains incessantly.
“These people are living in a concentration camp. I called it a concentration camp before they went there.
“The first thing that Martin Kobler said to me – he came up to me very very angry and he put his finger in my face and he said to me ‘You called it a concentration camp. You said it was a concentration camp. It’s not a concentration camp’.
“Well not only did I turn out to be right that it was a concentration camp, but it’s now become a killing field.
“I don’t know how Martin Kobler defines a concentration camp but if you take a look at those disgusting, ratty, little places where these people are being required to live, if that’s not a concentration camp, I don’t know what a concentration camp is, and on February 9th, it turned out to be a place in which people can just be slaughtered without any protection at all from Iraq, from UN, or from the US.”
The camp’s residents had all been moved from Ashraf, and were the same people who had handed over their arms to the US when they invaded Iraq in 2003 and effectively ‘surrendered their ability to defend themselves’, Mr Guilani said.
He added: “The US government gave them a promise when they surrendered their own weapons that they would act as protection for these people.
“To me that’s a solemn promise on my country. That’s a solemn promise that we have now broken time and time again. The US should be ashamed of itself for having broken that promise because the US was instrumental in requiring these people to leave Camp Ashraf, put on tremendous pressure to go to concentration camp living, put on tremendous pressure for 2 years to move.
“They basically threatened them, including the then Secretary of state Hillary Clinton, who basically threatened them that they wouldn’t be delisted unless they moved. What could that possibly have to do with listing or delisting?”
Martin Kobler then assured the Camp Ashraf residents that they would be safer at Liberty because it was near Baghdad and its airport, but it turned out to be a tiny, squalid area enclosed by an Iraqi military base, Mr Guiliani said.
He continued: “Martin Kobler made the point that this is a very secure place to be. You’re in a military base surrounded by the Iraqi military.
“He assured us of that even though the facilities looked horrible, they looked awful. He promised us those facilities would be fixed, he promised us they would be water, he promised us there would be electricity, he promised us many many things. And the most important thing he promised us is that they would be moved out of there very very quickly; that they would expedite the process of finding countries for all these people to go.
“I believe every single thing he said to us in June was a lie. Because he has proven himself to be a professional liar, which is unfortunate. I believe there is no choice with Martin Kobler, if the UN wants to do the right thing he should be removed immediately. He is doing the dirty work of the Iraqi and Iranian governments. He is not doing the work of the UN. He is not doing the work of trying to protect people who are in a vulnerable status.
“These people should all be declared immediately refugees. They should be all given refugee status. If they are not refugees than what exactly is a refugee? And I believe that my government that promised them protection back in 2003, that my government that promised them that they would be safe; when they were exerting great pressure to move from Ashraf to concentration camp liberty I believe my government owes a great debt to these people.”
Mr Guiliani said Camp Liberty was now so unsafe – and that the Iraqis must have allowed it to be attacked – that the residents should be moved to the United States for their own protecion.
He went on: “Why is this so important? It’s so important because when the US gives its word, it should mean something. If the US wants to be honored and respected in the world, we can’t give our word to someone be it one, three thousand or millions, and not take seriously the fact that we must keep our word.
“And second it would be really really important to change our dynamics with Iran. We all know Iran is on its way if it isn’t already a nuclear power. At best it’s months away.”
Sanctions were having an effect on the economy, but no impact on the government, on the ayatollah, or the power structure, he said.
Negotiations has also failed and and as long as Russia and China remained exempt from the sanctions, Iran would survive and could buy time to develop their nuclear weapons, he told delegates.
The final option of military action against Iran would be ‘very severe and very difficult,but he warned: “I believe if it has to be done it should be done, but I also believe that if it could be avoided, it should be avoided.”
And the most important way of avoiding full scale war with Iran was to support the legitimate opposition to the regime, which he described as ‘one of the worst in the world’.
He added: “We supported the people who overthrew Mubarak, we supported the people who overthrew Qaddafi. I think, the people who are attempting to overthrow Assad, at least we’re supporting them verbally.
“The Ayatollahs and Ahmadinejad are far worse certainly than Mubarak. Mubarak was pretty bad, but not nearly as bad as the regime in Tehran. Kaddafi was pretty bad, but he had given up his weapons of mass destruction, he had been kind of neutered, bad to his own people. Assad is terrible, but none of them compare to what Iran has done under this regime for the last 30 years.
“This is a horrible regime, we should be supporting the people who have a chance to overthrow this regime, and not doing what we did several years ago, turning our back on them and leaving them in the street unsupported.
“Here we have a group that has been on record for over a decade for supporting all of the things that are most important to us.
“This group supports a democratic Iran, they support a non-nuclear Iran, and they support an Iran that will be based on law. They support an Iran that will be protective of people’s rights. That respects the rights of women, this is a group, the president elect of this group- Madam Rajavi is a woman.
“This is a group that believes in equality of for men and women, in separation of church and state. This is a group that believes in all of the things that we believe in. And we don’t have to fear that in supporting this group we’re supporting a group that has a whole lot of hostile intentions.
“So I say if you want to gain leverage in your negotiations with Iran, if they ever take place, the best thing to do is to support the MEK as an alternative to the regime in Tehran.”