![\"37535438_303\"](\"https:\/\/www.ncr-iran.org\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2017\/02\/37535438_303.jpg\" "\\"37535438_303\\"")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
NCRI –\u00a0Ended Sunday February 20, the Munich Security Conference turned into a scene of condemning the Iranian regime for its disrupting security and stability in the region.<\/p>\n
The delegations in the conference had one sentence in common when speaking against the Iranian regime: the Iranian regime is the biggest state sponsor of terrorism in the world, said by US Vice President Mike Pence as well as Saudi FM Adel al-Jubeir. This consensus by itself makes it clear what a hostile atmosphere against the Iranian regime had been present in the conference.<\/p>\n
Also Turkish FM \u2018Mevlut Chavushoghlu\u2019 put this same issue another way while pointing to regime\u2019s interventions in Syria and Iraq. \u201cIranian regime is seeking sectarianism in the region\u201d, he said.<\/p>\n
The remarks made by Saudi FM had wide reactions in regime\u2019s media, each one headlining one of his remarks with concern. Titles such as \u201caccusations made by Saudi FM: Iran is the biggest sponsor of terrorism\/ Iran was hosting the leaders of Al-Qaida while the US was fighting them\u201d, was seen in all the state-run media.<\/p>\n
Meanwhile Iranian regime\u2019s FM \u2018Mohammad Javad Zarif\u2019 tried to assure his foreign counterparts of regime\u2019s capacity for following the nuclear deal formula to initiate another round of \u2018win-win\u2019 game similar to Geneva talks. \u201cWe\u2019re not going to antagonize any country. We never initiated any feud and don\u2019t intend to do so, either\u201d, said Zarif in his interview with BBC World Service, Monday February 20)<\/p>\n
The question that remains, however, is that especially following Hassan Rouhani\u2019s \u2018moderate\u2019 visit to Oman and Kuwait, and the announcement by the officials of the two countries that the regime has agreed to Persian Gulf Cooperation Council\u2019s demands, why Zarif\u2019s remarks not only failed to draw attention, but they had negative consequences as well?<\/p>\n
The answer can be easily found in state-run papers. Etemad, for instance, writes on February 21: \u201cthe leaders and elite in Saudi Arabia, Israel, and Turkey had this vision in recent years that with Barack Obama as President, the US administration wouldn\u2019t take any specific measure against Iran in order to put Tehran under pressure.\u201d<\/p>\n
Meaning that now the era has changed and the countries in the region see no obstacle in the way of seriously dealing with Iranian regime and settling the account with it. That\u2019s why they no longer accept regime\u2019s deceptive remarks and tactics and reject them altogether.<\/p>\n
This fact has been more clearly stated by a state-run newspaper. \u201cTo pass this stage, Iran has two options ahead. First, to strongly counter-react in areas in which the United States has vital interests, and the second is for Iran to act within the frameworks laid out by the United States in order to continue to have a role in the region and get out of the harnessed state. No doubt, the second option would ensure more strategic advantages for Iran.\u201d (Jahan-e-Sanat, February 20)<\/p>\n
So, it could be said that \u2018Obama\u2019s Golden Era\u2019 is over for the regime. And with that the tactics relevant to that era are also rejected, with no one in the region or the world accepting them. Thus, the Munich Security Conference\u2019s message which is nothing but \u2018Change of Era\u2019 has been conveyed to the regime, meaning that the time to get away with being held accountable has passed.<\/p>\n
This fact is backed by three important factors. The first is Iranian community\u2019s explosive atmosphere, which is also acknowledged by regime\u2019s officials.<\/p>\n
The second factor is the international pressures which we call it \u2018change of era\u2019, a harsh reality the regime has found out well despite all the \u2018moderate\u2019 flattering and window-dressing it did during the recent Munich conference.<\/p>\n
The third factor, which for Khamenei and other regime leaders is even more dangerous than the other two as it directs and makes both of them happen, is the organized, nationwide, and strong Resistance of Iran. The more the regime becomes weakened and crippled, the younger and stronger the resistance grows, gaining more domestic and international credit.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
NCRI – Ended Sunday February 20, the Munich Security Conference turned into a scene of condemning the Iranian regime for its disrupting security and stability in the region. The delegations in […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":48155,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[175],"class_list":["post-22222","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-iran-a-world","tag-updated"],"yoast_head":"\n