{"id":248552,"date":"2021-10-07T03:29:51","date_gmt":"2021-10-07T08:29:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ncr-iran.org\/en\/?p=248552"},"modified":"2023-02-01T21:21:20","modified_gmt":"2023-02-01T20:21:20","slug":"iran-regimes-new-deception-no-preconditions-for-nuclear-talks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.ncr-iran.org\/en\/news\/nuclear\/iran-regimes-new-deception-no-preconditions-for-nuclear-talks\/","title":{"rendered":"Iran Regime\u2019s New Deception: No Preconditions for Nuclear Talks"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Nuclear-talks-1\"<\/p>\n

Saeed Khatibzadeh, the Iranian regime\u2019s Foreign Ministry spokesperson, said Tehran would return to the nuclear talks with \u201cno preconditions.\u201d His remarks are part of the regime\u2019s duplicity, fearing possible unilateral international actions against Tehran\u2019s nuclear extortion.<\/p>\n

Days before Saeed Khatibzadeh\u2019s<\/a> remarks, his boss, Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian, said: \u201cI told the mediators if America\u2019s intentions are serious, then a serious indication was needed\u201d should give the regime at least \u201c$10 billion of blocked money.\u201d<\/p>\n

The U.S. administration rapidly rejected this demand. Even Germany, which has been trying to restore the nuclear deal, rejected the regime\u2019s demands.\u00a0\u201cIf here new conditions are being set by Iran for talks to be resumed, then we reject that,\u201d a German foreign ministry said on October 4, according to Reuters.<\/p>\n

On September<\/a> 12, Rafael Grossi, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), struck a deal with the regime allowing the IAEA inspectors to service monitoring equipment. This agreement happened on the eve of a meeting of the IAEA\u2019s Board of governors, which could have resulted in the most serious measures against the regime\u2019s provocative actions.<\/p>\n

But on September 26, the IAEA reported that the regime did not allow the \u201cagency access to the TESA Karaj<\/a> centrifuge component manufacturing workshop,\u201d which was \u201ccontrary to the agreed terms of the joint statement issued on September 12.\u201d<\/p>\n

In other words, when Tehran felt its provocative steps could have serious repercussions for it, it resorted to duplicity. Unfortunately, the U.N. nuclear watchdog and the western powers fell for this tactic, allowing the regime to dodge possible consequences for its actions, yet continue its race toward an atomic bomb.\u00a0The regime had never intended to stop its nuclear program, even when it had signed the famous Iran nuclear deal with world powers in 2015.<\/p>\n

In 2015, the P5+1 signed a nuclear deal with the Iranian regime, known formally as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). The JCPOA lacked the requirements of an international treaty and, as warned by the Iranian Resistance at that time, couldn\u2019t \u201cneither block the mullahs\u2019 pathways to deception nor their access to a nuclear bomb.\u201d<\/p>\n

<\/div>
Fitting a Square Peg into a Round Hole with Iran Negotiations - April 2021<\/div><\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div><\/div><\/div>