Two-minute read
As Iran’s domestic crisis deepens—rattled by soaring inflation, nationwide strikes, and international isolation—the clerical regime is seizing on a deadly shooting in Washington, D.C. to project strength through violence, even at the cost of international condemnation.
The May 23 assassination of two Israeli embassy staff outside a Jewish cultural event in the U.S. capital by 31-year-old Elias Rodriguez has not just sparked diplomatic alarm; it has also been openly celebrated in Iranian regime media as a model of “resistance” to be replicated worldwide.
In an incendiary segment aired on Channel 3 on May 27, a state anchor declared with unmistakable clarity: “This is exactly the kind of action that should spread across the world… No agent or affiliate of the Zionist regime should feel safe anywhere.”
Labeling the attack “symbolic,” the presenter called on others to emulate Rodriguez so Israelis would be “afraid to leave their own homes.”
The rhetoric was not isolated.
#Iran’s State Media Glorifies U.S. Shooting Suspect to Bolster Regime Morale Amid Mounting Crisishttps://t.co/hFKHptA10S
— NCRI-FAC (@iran_policy) May 24, 2025
Kayhan, the newspaper directly controlled by the office of the regime’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, published a dialogue-style column the same day titled “Basij of Washington!”, glorifying Rodriguez and likening him to regime-backed martyrs: “God bless him. A good and pious start… They say ‘the Basij of Washington’ has now declared its presence.”
The piece compared Rodriguez to Mohammad Shahsavari, a regime fighter captured in the Iran-Iraq War, who was celebrated for shouting anti-Saddam slogans under torture.
On regime-affiliated social media, hashtags like #الیاس_رودریگز trended with praise such as: “Elias Rodriguez stood on the right side of history.”
#Iran News:
Khamenei Exploits #Palestinian Blood for Strategic Gainhttps://t.co/9wwPB9KKUc— NCRI-FAC (@iran_policy) June 12, 2024
In a separate report, Mehr News framed the attack’s impact symbolically, stating that Rodriguez’s act had “struck even Washington with the isolation that Tel Aviv now faces,” implicitly casting the U.S. capital as part of a global backlash.
The media apparatus was carefully orchestrated: no official government body took formal responsibility, but the ideological engine embraced the killing as its own. Notably, the clerical dictatorship has not condemned the act, and key regime voices like IRGC-affiliated platforms have treated Rodriguez as a revolutionary figure.
This propaganda offensive comes as Iran faces rising unrest at home. Dozens of cities have seen strikes and protests in recent weeks. Electricity and fuel shortages, combined with a failing economy, have pushed the regime into a state of internal siege. Analysts note the pattern: when domestic dissent swells, Tehran often turns to proxy attacks or external events to reassert control over the narrative.
Making Sense of #Iranian Officials’ Ambiguous Assertions about #October7 Attackshttps://t.co/s7v6R0Q2ue
— NCRI-FAC (@iran_policy) January 7, 2024
The regime’s message is unmistakable: it will embrace and amplify any act of violence that appears to hit its enemies, even if the cost is international backlash. And in doing so, it reveals more than ideological obsession—it exposes deep anxiety about its own fragility.
Despite attempts to frame the act as a spontaneous eruption of solidarity with Palestinians, the Iranian regime’s response suggests something else: a desperate state, clinging to terror as statecraft, parading global violence to mask local collapse.