Tuesday, July 8, 2025
HomeIran News NowIran Nuclear NewsIran’s Regime Expels UN Inspectors in Nuclear Extortion Bid

Iran’s Regime Expels UN Inspectors in Nuclear Extortion Bid

IAEA director general Rafael Grossi
IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi leaving the stage after a press conference

Two-minute read

In a troubling escalation, the Iranian regime has expelled international nuclear inspectors and formally suspended cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). While Tehran claims the move is a security measure following the 12-day war, it is in fact a calculated act of nuclear extortion—using post-war chaos to shield its atomic program from oversight and pressure world powers into political concessions.

The IAEA confirmed that its inspectors, who had been stationed in Tehran since the outbreak of military conflict in mid-June, were forced to leave Iran on July 4. This unprecedented withdrawal comes just two days after the regime president Masoud Pezeshkian signed a new law halting official cooperation with the UN agency. The law was passed swiftly by the regime’s parliament and rubber-stamped by the Guardian Council, with no public debate or accountability.

A Deliberate Breakdown in Oversight

The removal of inspectors has effectively dismantled the last meaningful international mechanism for monitoring the regime’s nuclear activities. By cutting off IAEA access, Tehran is not just evading oversight—it is leveraging that opacity as a tool of extortion. There is now no independent way to verify the status of Iran’s enrichment facilities, centrifuge operations, or its growing stockpile of highly enriched uranium.

Even before the recent war, Iran’s regime had already reduced transparency by disabling monitoring cameras, barring access to key sites, and stonewalling questions about undeclared nuclear material. The current withdrawal of IAEA personnel marks a turning point — not driven by necessity, but by strategic choice.

Despite Tehran’s claims of adhering to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), the regime has continued to enrich uranium up to 60% purity — just below weapons-grade — a level that no other non-nuclear weapon state pursues. In May, the IAEA reported that Iran had amassed more than 400 kg of highly enriched uranium, enough for several bombs if further processed.

Regime Defiance Wrapped in Propaganda

The regime’s foreign minister Abbas Araghchi attempted to justify Iran’s actions in a series of inflammatory statements on X, blaming Western governments for the collapse of diplomacy. He dismissed reports of Iran’s noncompliance as “fake news” and accused Germany, the U.S., and the EU of conducting “Nazi-style” aggression and genocide — rhetoric that reveals the regime’s deepening isolation and desperation.

Rather than acknowledge the real concerns of the international community, Araghchi used his platform to promote conspiracy theories and revisionist history, accusing Germany of aiding Saddam Hussein and backing genocide in Gaza. He declared that the European Union and UK are now “irrelevant” in any future nuclear talks.

Such statements underscore Tehran’s unwillingness to engage in genuine diplomacy. Instead, the regime is attempting to reshape the narrative by blaming its own belligerence on others — even as it dismantles the very safeguards meant to ensure the peaceful nature of its nuclear program.

International Alarm and Warnings

Western officials have reacted with grave concern. The United States, France, and Germany condemned Iran’s unilateral suspension of cooperation with the IAEA, warning that it threatens regional stability and undermines global nonproliferation norms.

IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi urged Iran’s regime to return to compliance and restart inspections, emphasizing the “crucial importance” of re-establishing verification and monitoring. But with inspectors now gone and access cut off, the international community has few tools left to determine how close Iran is to building a bomb.

The regime’s strategy is clear: exploit the post-war chaos to quietly accelerate its nuclear program, silence oversight, reject accountability—and use the resulting threat as leverage to extort political and economic concessions from the international community.

NCRI
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.