Four-minute read
Reza Pahlavi’s November tour of Belgium and Germany has exposed significant obstacles to his campaign for international recognition. Behind the diplomatic photo opportunities and a controversial award ceremony in Frankfurt were institutional refusals, political boycotts, protests by Iranian organizations, and renewed questions about his claims to represent the Iranian people.
The controversies coincided with a major setback to the political calculations surrounding his leadership ambitions: the US-Israeli war against Iran had not delivered the regime change anticipated by his supporters, and the war’s American sponsors had suffered a major electoral defeat.
Belgium Refuses to Recognize Pahlavi as Iran’s Representative
The first setback came before Pahlavi’s arrival in Brussels.
On October 21, Belgium’s Chamber of Representatives abandoned plans for an official reception after parliamentary groups failed to reach consensus. The decision followed reservations expressed by Foreign Minister Maxime Prévot, who warned against treating Pahlavi as the sole representative of Iran’s diverse opposition.
On October 23, Prévot publicly rejected demands to recognize him as the legitimate representative of the Iranian people.
“Precisely in the name of democracy, the decision as to who should lead Iran is one that must rest solely with the Iranian people,” he declared.
The Belgian-German broadcaster BRF confirmed that the Foreign Ministry had raised concerns over both political representation and security risks.
The opposition extended beyond Belgium’s parliamentary leadership. Six Iranian-Belgian associations welcomed the cancellation of the official reception, while 47 Iranian associations from Belgium and neighboring European countries reportedly challenged the planned engagements.
A separate controversy erupted over Defence Minister Theo Francken’s invitation to Pahlavi to address the Royal Military Academy.
Approximately 30 Belgian public figures signed an open letter challenging the invitation. Signatories included former ministers Louis Michel, Gérard Deprez and André Flahaut, as well as former senator Pierre Galand.
They questioned whether a national military institution should provide a platform to a figure criticized for failing to distance himself from the human rights abuses of his father’s dictatorship.
Francken’s office subsequently clarified that the invitation did not constitute political support for Pahlavi’s ambitions or any particular form of government.
The Brussels Times documented the criticism from Iranian organizations, Belgian politicians, and human rights groups.
.@ProfSheehan & @Dr_Rafizadeh | From Ahmad #Chalabi to Reza #Pahlavi: The politics of manufactured opposition | Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) | 30 OCT 2026 #Iran #Iraq #Intelligence #Dictatorship #Democracy #FreeIran #ForeignPolicy #GlobalAffairs 🌎 https://t.co/xrOPT4xK5b
— Ivan Sascha Sheehan, Ph.D. (@ProfSheehan) October 30, 2026
Frankfurt’s Freedom Prize Sparks an International Protest
In Germany, the controversy centered on the Friedrich Naumann Foundation’s decision to have Pahlavi receive its 2026 Freedom Prize on behalf of the Iranian people.
That decision triggered objections from prominent German politicians and Iranian organizations.
An open letter signed by 82 German public figures challenged the selection. Among those identified in press coverage were former Bundestag president Wolfgang Thierse, former federal ministers Brigitte Zypries, Herta Däubler-Gmelin and Peter Altmaier, and former Constitutional Court judge Susanne Baer.
The controversy gained international dimensions when 306 Iranian associations across Europe, North America and Australia signed a protest letter.
The signatories argued that assigning the award to Pahlavi disregarded Iranians who had suffered political persecution under the monarchy and rejected both the former dictatorship and the present theocracy.
Their objections were documented by Frankfurter Rundschau and Presseportal.
Former political prisoners of the Shah also protested. Survivors described imprisonment and torture by SAVAK, the monarchy’s notorious intelligence organization.
The objections were not confined to exile communities.
AFP reported on November 7 that approximately 200 prisoners currently held inside Iran had signed a protest letter, according to the Society for German-Iranians in Hesse. The prisoners reportedly regarded Pahlavi as a symbol of a previous dictatorship.
German Political Figures Boycott the Ceremony
The controversy reached Frankfurt’s municipal leadership.
The Social Democratic Party and Greens boycotted the Paulskirche ceremony. The Left Party also objected to the venue, questioning whether a political event of this nature complied with rules governing its use.
Frankfurt’s culture official, Ina Hartwig, described the foundation’s selection as a deeply unfortunate decision and declined to attend.
SPD parliamentary group chairman Kolja Müller was explicit: “For us, Reza Pahlavi is not a suitable representative of the Iranian people.”
His party argued that honoring Iranians struggling for democracy should not entail granting symbolic representation to an unelected claimant associated with the former monarchy.
The controversy also revived questions about Pahlavi’s relationship with his father’s record. Hessenschau highlighted documented repression under the Shah, including political imprisonment and torture by SAVAK, alongside criticism of Pahlavi’s response to that history.
ARD report on May 28, 2026, exposes Reza Pahlavi supporters' violent campaign: threats to #journalist & activists, assaults on NCRI supporter in Hamburg, 2 arrested Canada (#MasoudMasjoudi murder), and SAVAK marches in Regensburg. Watch English-dubbed video. pic.twitter.com/dMduwPpg6x
— NCRI-FAC (@iran_policy) May 29, 2026
The War That Did Not Open the Road to Power
The European disputes followed a more consequential disappointment in Washington.
A major Reuters investigation published July 28 examined Pahlavi’s attempt to emerge as a transitional leader following the US-Israeli war launched in February.
But the anticipated collapse of the clerical dictatorship failed to materialize despite the aerial bombardment.
Washington continued diplomatic negotiations, and the June US-Iran understanding contained no commitment to regime change.
Vice President JD Vance dismissed suggestions that the administration intended to install Pahlavi.
“The President of the United States never said that his goal was to install Reza Pahlavi,” Vance stated.
Reuters also documented growing donor dissatisfaction, doubts about Pahlavi’s organizational networks inside Iran and the collapse of earlier efforts to unite the opposition.
The investigation described accusations of harassment by some Pahlavi supporters against other dissidents. The gap between expectations and results was substantial: foreign intervention had not produced a new government, and Washington had declined to endorse his accession to power.
Inside Iran, Protest and Repression Continue
While Pahlavi’s selection as a prize custodian dominated some European headlines, demonstrators, workers and political prisoners inside Iran continued confronting the clerical dictatorship.
On November 3, authorities executed Amirhossein Maleki and Amirhossein Ebrahimi, arrested during January’s nationwide uprising.
Human rights organizations reported that nine defendants in the related Isfahan case had been executed since July following proceedings involving torture-tainted confessions and serious violations of due process.
On November 5, Associated Press documented intensified repression of university students, including expulsions, disciplinary proceedings and intimidation.
Inside Iran, resistance continued despite escalating executions and repression. According to the Iranian Resistance, PMOI Resistance Units carried out 30 operations on November 2 against regime-linked centers and symbols of repression, alongside a broader campaign of 90 activities across 25 cities. On November 4, they reported another 30 operations in 17 cities, targeting IRGC and Basij facilities and regime propaganda installations, following the execution of two young protesters arrested during January’s uprising. Meanwhile, the “No to Executions Tuesdays” campaign marked its 145th consecutive week, with prisoners in 66 prisons participating in hunger strikes. Retirees, farmers and workers also staged protests across Iranian cities, while Resistance Units in Zahedan reaffirmed their rejection of both clerical and monarchical dictatorship.
The contrast could hardly be more striking. While European institutions debated who should symbolically receive an award in the name of the Iranian people, those confronting the clerical dictatorship inside Iran continued to face imprisonment, torture and execution.
Freedom is neither bestowed at award ceremonies nor secured in the safe havens of exile. It is won through blood, sweat and tears, by those who confront repression on the ground and pay the price for their struggle.