Thursday, July 2, 2020
Home News News: Iran Resistance UK Parliament Foreign Affairs Committee Publishes BCFIF Report Exposing Iran Regime’s Atrocities...

UK Parliament Foreign Affairs Committee Publishes BCFIF Report Exposing Iran Regime’s Atrocities and Supporting Iranian Resistance

UK Parliament Foreign Affairs Committee Publishes BCFIF Report Exposing Iran Regime’s Atrocities and Supporting Iranian Resistance
UK Parliament

The Foreign Affairs Committee of the United Kingdom’s House of Commons posted a report produced by the British Committee for Iran Freedom (BCFIF) on its website. The report serves as an official recommendation to the UK government and sends a strong message to the religious fascism ruling Iran. This evidence submitted by BCFIF to the UK Parliament underlines the need to counter the Iranian regime’s threats and support the Iranian people and their organized resistance.  

With more than 20 years of experience and expertise in affairs concerning Iran and the Middle East, the British Committee for Iran Freedom (BCFIF) is a leader for analysis of Iranian affairs.  Comprised of over 100 cross-Party MPs and Peers, the committee has been active for the past two decades in shaping policy on Iran in favour of a firm approach towards Iran’s theocratic regime and support for the Iranian people and their legitimate resistance movement to achieve a secular democracy. In pursuit of its aims, the Committee enjoys links with the Anglo-Iranian societies in the UK, especially supporters of the opposition groups, the NCRI and the PMOI/MEK,” read the report introducing the BCFIF and its objectives.  

 

At a conference in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 21 January, cross-party MPs and Peers discussed the future UK Policy on Iran following the recent protests in the country.

Cross-party MPs, Peers and prominent jurists support NCRI and Iran Uprisings led by women for regime change, IWD Conference in the House of Commons, 25 February 2020

Dozens of cross-party MPs and Peers discussed the Iranian regime’s systematic human rights abuses and its alarming use of death penalty at a conference in Parliament on 17 October 2019.

Cross-party members from both Houses of Parliament UK must use its voice in the UN to support Iranian people’s democratic aspirations and the struggle of women for freedom

Introduction 

When deciding on the right approach for the UK Government in the face of the Iranian regime, it is essential for one to be sufficiently aware of the core and foundations of this theocracy, how it was brought about, and its record and actions over the last 4 decades, especially in the recent past in Iran and its foreign policies on a regional and worldwide scale. 

In the Iranian people’s revolution against the monarchy on the 11th February 1979, the main demands of the people were freedom and democracy. They had risen up against censorship and oppression, arrests and torture of political and human rights activists and corruption within the ruling Shah’s family. The main leading opposition groups had received numerous blows from the Shah’s SAVAK service and had many of their leaders imprisoned and even executed. Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, who was exiled in Iraq, took advantage of the Iranian people’s religious tendencies and by utilising a network of mullahs already in Iran was able to mislead people as to his true intentions and establish a strangle-hold on the leadership of the revolution and violently establish his “Islamic Republic”. (See historic background in reference 1a for more information.) 

The Human Rights situation and that of other basic individual and social freedoms under the system of the Absolute Rule of Clergy (Velayat e Faqih): 

Under the banner of religion, the worst type of oppression against the bulk of the population, especially directed towards women and ethnic and religious minorities, was imposed by the mullahs, from forcing women to wear veils to their exclusion from areas of education and participation in certain jobs and access to transport etc. 

Until now, the regime has been condemned by way of 66 resolutions drafted and issued by different bodies of the UN because of its systemic violations of Human Rights; but systematic suppression still continues in Iran.  

The regime is the leading executioner per capita in the world. 

The hostage-taking of individuals with dual Iranian-British, Iranian-European or Iranian-American citizenship in Iran, arrests and subsequent long term prison sentences under the banner of threats to national security or spying on behalf of foreign countries are ways in which the regime tries to blackmail western countries to obtain ransom money and other forms of political credit, especially since Rouhani was appointed as President. 

Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe is a British-Iranian dual national and charity worker from north London who was held and imprisoned on bogus national security charges in Iran in April 2016. She was arrested at Tehran’s Imam Khomeini airport on her way back to UK and sentenced to five years for spying, a charge which she denies. 

Her case have been raised with Iranian regime’s leaders and ministers by both the Prime Minister and several Foreign Secretaries since her arrest. The FCO has accused Iran’s regime of being engaged in hostage diplomacy by using Ms Zaghari-Ratcliffe and other British dual nationals to exert political leverage. 

On 7 March 2019, the then Foreign Secretary, the Rt Hon Jeremy Hunt MP, decided that the UK should exercise diplomatic protection in the case of Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe as part of the Government’s continuing efforts to secure her release.  

On various occasions, Iran’s regime has asked UK to pay an alleged 400 million dollar debt to Iran to facilitate the release of Ms Zaghari-Ratcliffe. 

It is necessary to point out that upon coming to power, Khomeini dissolved Iran’s judicial system and forced many judges and lawyers into retirement or made them redundant. This included excluding women from the judiciary. The common laws were abolished and replaced by man-made “Islamic” laws that were founded on the fundamentalist theories of the mullahs. The Supreme Leader established Islamic Revolution courts. All judges were selected on the basis of loyalty to Khomeini and appointed as Sharia rulers. Many of these “judges” had not even completed primary or secondary school education, let alone having any sort of higher qualification in law or law-related subjects. Consequently Iran’s current framework of law bears very little resemblance to other legal jurisprudence throughout the world. 

In an interview Ahmad Janati, who was the regime’s chief justice, said that he along with the other mullahs had had no formal education and that Khomeini taught them how to apply the death sentence.  

The attack on the UK embassy in Iran was dismissed under the banner of angry youths protesting but in fact was an officially sanctioned attack in which all buildings and belongings of the embassy were looted, destroyed and set alight.  

When the UK decided to reopen its embassy, it was in the absence of any apology for the flagrant attack on diplomatic premises. Many in Iran’s leadership interpreted this as a sign of weakness on the part of the UK Government. They took this as a signal that they had no need to apologise and could simply deny any responsibility for the previous attack. They elected to describe it as “youth’s objection” to the “UK Government’s evil”. 

The Iranian opposition NCRI later revealed that the attack on the UK embassy was in fact ordered by Khamenei and carried out by members and associates of the IRGC and Basij forces. 

The arbitrary arrest and illegal detention of the UK Ambassador in Tehran in January 2020 is another example of the regime’s contempt for the normal rules of diplomatic exchange 

Senior officials within the regime have been quoted as demanding that the Ambassador be slaughtered and “chopped into pieces” 

The only rational advice as to the policy that should be adopted towards Iran is that the UK should be firm in the face of a regime which is contemptuous of diplomatic obligations and international conventions and is the biggest state sponsor of terrorism in the world. There is little doubt that the Iranian Embassy in London is used to support a network of spies on those the regime regards as its enemies. 

There must be some serious doubt about the value of orthodox ambassadorial exchange in the current climate. This regime does not conform to any sort of international legal or diplomatic framework. It interprets diplomatic activity as a sign of weakness and an opportunity to be exploited.  

Uprising in Iran – Time for change – Boycott of sham election 

The widespread uprising in Iran and the tone of the slogans against the regime in recent years, (December 2017, January 2018, November 2019 and January 2020) along with the ever-increasing strikes and protests by people against oppression, poverty, inflation, systemic corruption and embezzlement of large funds by key figures in the regime are all signals that it is time for a change. 

In recent protests the Iranian people chanted slogans such as ‘death to Khamenei’, ‘death to Rouhani’, ‘death to oppressor Shah or leader (Khamenei)’, ‘Basig and Sepah’ (revolutionary guard) you are Daesh (ISIS)’, ‘people are beggars ‘Agha’ (Khamenei) rules as a God’,  ‘using Islam to destroy people and hardliners’, ‘reformist this is the end of an era’. 

Khamenei’s order of ‘shoot to kill’ during the uprising of November 2019 led to 1,500 deaths, 4,000 injured and the arrest of 12,000 people. The regime’s order to disconnect people from the internet all over Iran is a further sign of how much it fears the spread of information. 

Economic bankruptcy, millions of young unemployed and widespread poverty (affecting 70% of Iran’s population) is not due to international sanctions, rather to corruption, embezzlement, engagement in terrorist activity within the region, missile development and the nuclear programme. Together, these factors have increased the Iranian people’s discontent and pushed the country to the point of crisis. 

That widespread discontent is evidenced by the boycotting of the sham parliamentary elections in February 2020. Many media and international observers reported the lack of participation. This was a conscious choice from a people who know that Iran’s is a sham democracy and that only those approved by the mullahs can be elected. 

Export of terrorism, warmongering and destabilising activities 

  1. This regime has so far been responsible for hundreds of terrorist operations outside Iran’s borders.
  2. Over the last three decades U.S. State Department annual reports, under both Democrat and Republican administrations, have consistently referred to the regime as the main state sponsor of international terrorism.
  3. The regime has spent billions of dollars of oil revenues to support terrorist and warmongering projects in various countries 
  4. After the nuclear deal with P5+1 in 2015 and the lifting of part of the sanctions, more than $150 billion was received by the regime in unfrozen assets. This money has been used to increase Iran’s export of terrorism and interference in the internal affairs of other countries within the region, especially Syria, Yemen and Iraq and Palestine. During this period Iran’s economy has all but collapsed and the living conditions of the Iranian people are worsening by the day. Supporters of the regime seek to blame this on western sanctions.
  5. Iran is currently financing Hezbollah in Lebanon and Iraq, terrorist groups of Kata’ib Hezbollah, Asa’ib Ahl al-Haq, Jaysh al-Mahdi, Hashd al-Shaabi, Badr Corps, etc. in Iraq; the Houthis in Yemen; Bashar al-Assad in Syria; Hamas and Hezbollah against Israel; and, the export of weapons and explosives to Bahrain and other countries in the region.
  6. Lebanese Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah admitted that their weapons, money and all their expenses, including clothing and food, are provided by the Islamic Republic of Iran.
  7. Iranian-sponsored elements continue to mount terrorist operations and assassination attempts on opponents in various European countries as well as Turkey.
  8. There have been a number of terrorist operations and assassinations directed at political activists with Iranian origins, in Denmark, Sweden and the Netherlands.
  9. In March 2018, Iranian sponsored agents were responsible for an attempt to kill members of the main opposition ‘The People’s Mojahedin Organisation of Iran’ in the presence of Mrs. Maryam Rajavi, President-elect of the National Council of Resistance of Iran, at the Iranian New Year’s gathering in Tirana, Albania. This effort was thwarted due to the joint efforts and vigilance of security organisations of European governments, the United States and the Albanian security forces. Following the operation, the Albanian government expelled the Iranian Ambassador and two other terrorist/diplomats in December 2018.

In October 23, 2019, the central office of the Albanian security forces announced at a press conference that two other Iranian diplomats, who had been in contact with Qassem Soleimani (late commander of the regime’s terrorist Quds Force), were expelled from the country due to plans to carry out terrorist operations.  

  1. A cooperation between the Belgian, French, and Germany police, intelligence agencies and judiciary foiled a planned terrorist plot by the regime in Tehran to bomb the grand gathering of the NCRI, and the PMOI/MEK, in Paris on 30 June 2018. The gathering in support of a free and democratic Iran was attended by close to 100,000 people including a 35-member delegation of current and former British MPs, the Iranian opposition leader Maryam Rajavi and many prominent figures who could have been killed, had the plot gone ahead.

A joint press release of the Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office and the Belgian Federal Intelligence and Security Agency on 2 July 2018 confirmed that a terrorism investigation had been initiated by the Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office in connection to the foiled bomb plot. 

The press release also added: “A husband and wife, both of Belgian nationality but of Iranian origin, were arrested in Belgium and charged with attempted terrorist murder and the preparation of a terrorist offence. Both are suspected of wanting to commit a bomb attack in Villepinte (France) onSaturday 30 June 2018 at a conference held there by the MEK.” 

According to the press release, “A contact person of the couple, Assadollah A., born on 22 December 1971, of Iranian nationality, was also arrested in Germany. He is an Iranian diplomat at the Austrian Embassy in Vienna”. He was later extradited to Belgium where he is now awaiting trial for his role in the foiled terrorist attack. 

On 2 October 2018, French officials said Iran’s ministry of intelligence was behind the plot to bomb a rally of Iranian opposition groups in Paris in June. In a statement, the French government said it had frozen the assets of two senior Iranian officials. 

In a statement on 8 January 2019, the FCO said, “The UK and a number of European partners today jointly raised with Iran our deep concerns about hostile activities and plots being planned and perpetrated in Europe. Such actions are unacceptable and must have consequences. We informed the Iranian authorities that those responsible for the June 2018 bomb plot planned in France are being included on the EU list of persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts and will be subject to restrictive measures.”13 

In October 2017, Bob Blackman MP and 69 other cross-party MPs supported Early Day Motion 483 requesting that the Revolutionary Guards, as a whole, be placed on the British terrorist list. 

  1. The regime’s piracy includes mine-laying and blowing up the Japanese oil tanker in the waters of the Persian Gulf.

12 and 13. There have been attacks on Norwegian and Saudi ships in Oman waters.  

  1. A US drone was shot down over international waters.
  2. The Iranian regime violated international sanctions against the Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad by sending an oil tanker to the country. This tanker was seized by the authorities in Gibraltar with the assistance of the Royal Navy. Despite the disapproval of the US government, the tanker was later released on the strength of a letter of commitment signed by the Iranian regime in the Gibraltar court stating that the destination of the tanker was not Syria.  However, only a few days later, the tanker switched off its radars and ended up in Syria.

The Iranian regime’s move drew criticism from the United States of the British government, saying that they were deceived by the Iranian regime’s lies.  

  1. Intercepting and impounding a British tanker from international waters and taking it to the southern ports of Iran on 21 July, 2019. After weeks of continuous international pressure it was finally released on 27 September.

17.  Extensive missile strikes on Aramco oil facilities in Saudi Arabia, which supplied 5 percent of the world’s oil and energy, and destroying large parts of it, was another terrorist attack of Khamenei’s Revolutionary Guard Corps. 

Iran continues to advance its ballistic missile and nuclear programme 

  1. The Iranian regime continues to test ballistic missiles in violation of UN Security Council Resolutions.
  2. In a joint statement on Iran on January 14, 2020, French, German and UK foreign ministers said that Tehran is not meeting its commitments on its nuclear programme and that they were referring the issue to the Dispute Resolution Mechanism.
  3. According to media reports in November 2019, Iranian authorities arrested a UN nuclear inspector in Iran.
  4. The IAEA Director General, Rafael Mariano Grossi, called on Iran on March 9, 2020 to cooperate immediately and fully with the IAEA and provide prompt access to locations which it has refused to let Agency inspectors visit, according to a statement by the International Nuclear watchdog.

International Support for the Iranian Resistance 

The National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), which is led by its president-elect Maryam Rajavi, advocates a secular and democratic Iran and enjoys grass-roots support inside Iran and widespread support among cross-party British and international political figures and other personalities. This support was displayed at the Free Iran conference in Albania, home of the members of the main Iranian Resistance, in July 2019. These are people who were moved under an international agreement from the former Camp Ashraf in Iraq. (See reference 3 for excerpts from international speakers at the Free Iran conference.)  

Dr Matthew Offord MP led a delegation of British politicians and lawyers to attend the Free Iran conference. In a speech during the main event, Matthew said: 

“The British delegation is here to remind our government of our obligations under international laws of human rights. I believe that we should follow the US example and proscribe the Iranian Republican Guard Corps as a terrorist organisation. They have a malign influence throughout the Middle East and are now threatening the UK government directly with attacks on our oil tankers.” 

Going on to confirm his support for the resistance in Iran, Matthew stated: “The cause of human rights, freedom and democracy in Iran has widespread support in both Houses of the UK Parliament. This includes strong support for Madame Rajavi’s 10-point democratic platform for future Iran, which abolishes the death penalty and prohibits torture. These are values that are close to our hearts and at the centre of our democracy in UK.” 

Conclusion 

It is clear to a wide range of those who have studied the situation in Iran that it is virtually impossible to have a constructive, bilateral relationship with a regime which has such appalling track record. 

The only correct way to respond to a regime which insists on promoting state sponsored terrorism sponsored is with firmness. This requires strong condemnation of their unacceptable behaviour and economic and diplomatic sanctions unless they are willing to work within the international community. 

Normal diplomatic language and conventional relations do not work with Iran. It is like nourishing a viper in one’s bosom. There is no indication that they are willing to end their infiltration and spread of terrorism in Britain and Europe. The longer this goes on the greater the damage will be. 

Iran is at a historic cross-road. It is impossible to believe that the current level of repression at home will be tolerated without a massive reaction and its international behaviour can only lead to isolation. 

The UK should abandon what is a policy of near-appeasement in favour of one that recognises the ongoing popular protests for change, holds the regime to account for its atrocities at home and abroad and backs a viable Iranian alternative supported by the Iranian people which already exists in the NCRI and has been articulated in its democratic plan for future of Iran.32 

This firm policy should include the following recommendations in each area of concerns: 

Supporting the Iranian Alternative 

The UK Government should: 

  • recognise the democratic aspirations of the Iranian people and their right to change the regime for a better future;
  • support the brave protesters in Iran and their organised Resistance movement, the NCRI, as they spearhead the popular struggle for democratic change in Iran;
  • recognise and back the NCRI President-elect, Mrs Maryam Rajavi’s 10-point plan for the future of Iran as a viable democratic alternative to the current theocratic regime in Iran32.

Accountability for Regime Leaders for Serious Human Rights Abuses 

The UK Government should: 

  • urgently take the necessary actions, as a permanent member of the UN Security Council and respected member of the Human rights Council, to ask the UN Secretary General Mr António Guterres, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Mrs Michelle Bachelet and the Special Rapporteur on Human Rights in Iran,  Mr Javaid Rehman, to send a fact-finding mission to Iran to investigate the killing of protesters and reports of torture in Iran’s prisons of those arrested.  This has been called for by the NCRI President-elect, Maryam Rajavi;
  • press the regime to immediately release all political prisoners, dual citizens and those arrested in the recent popular protests;
  • work with allies at the UN to hold the regime and its leaders to account for their atrocities including the killing of protesters and the brutal crackdown on the recent popular uprisings as well as the 1988 massacre of 30,000 political prisoners in Iran’s prisons, by referring those responsible to an international tribunal.

Countering Regime’s Destabilising Role in the Region 

The UK Government should: 

proscribe the IRGC and Iran’s Intelligence Ministry as terrorist organisations in their entirety in order to deny the regime resources and funds it will use to suppress protesters and export terrorism. 

work with international and regional allies to expel the IRGC from Syria, Iraq and the Middle East. 

Addressing Regime’s Nuclear Deception and Future of the JCPOA 

The UK Government should work with international allies to reinstate the six UN Security Council resolutions on Iran’s nuclear programme and the nuclear- related UN sanctions.

References 

Reference 1a: Historic background 

When Khomeini came to power in Iran, unlike his promises in France, a few months prior to the revolution, forced the Iranian people into a referendum of “yes” to the Islamic Revolution as the only way of saying “no” to the previous disdained monarchy. He then, with the help of a few of his trusted mullahs, managed to write the Constitution of the Islamic Republic. In Khomeini’s book, the Supreme Leader has absolute power that is superior to all other persons or authorities. 

According to article 110 of the Constitution, the major choices regarding the Government will be made by the Supreme Leader. The Supreme Leader and related offices will have complete authority over the three branches of government, the judicial branch, the legislative branch and the executive branch, the ability to appoint the head of the judiciary, command of all the armed forces, the power to determine all internal relations and foreign policies, control of all the key business and financial foundations, control of state media et al. After Khomeini’s death in 1989, Ali Khamenei, with the support of Hashemi Rafsanjani, was promoted to Ayatollah status and was officially declared the next Supreme Leader by the assembly of experts in Iran. 

FOLLOW NCRI

70,612FansLike
34,238FollowersFollow